WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:10.150 align:middle line:90% 00:00:10.150 --> 00:00:10.790 align:middle line:90% Hello. 00:00:10.790 --> 00:00:14.210 align:middle line:84% My name is Frank De Stasi, and I'm an applications engineer 00:00:14.210 --> 00:00:16.320 align:middle line:90% here at Texas Instruments. 00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:17.890 align:middle line:84% And today, we're going to be looking 00:00:17.890 --> 00:00:22.980 align:middle line:84% at the EMI of a nonsynchronous buck converter. 00:00:22.980 --> 00:00:26.490 align:middle line:84% Now, many engineers believe that it's almost impossible 00:00:26.490 --> 00:00:28.990 align:middle line:84% to get the same good EMI performance 00:00:28.990 --> 00:00:32.159 align:middle line:84% from a nonsynchronous regulator as it is 00:00:32.159 --> 00:00:34.240 align:middle line:90% from a synchronous converter. 00:00:34.240 --> 00:00:35.860 align:middle line:84% And today, we're going to show you 00:00:35.860 --> 00:00:38.090 align:middle line:84% how to get just as good performance 00:00:38.090 --> 00:00:40.820 align:middle line:84% from a nonsynchronous regulator as you can 00:00:40.820 --> 00:00:42.890 align:middle line:90% from a synchronous converter. 00:00:42.890 --> 00:00:45.600 align:middle line:84% So first, let's take a look at the differences 00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:50.630 align:middle line:84% between a synchronous and a nonsynchronous converter. 00:00:50.630 --> 00:00:53.270 align:middle line:84% We see on this slide on the left-hand side 00:00:53.270 --> 00:00:56.700 align:middle line:84% a typical synchronous buck converter. 00:00:56.700 --> 00:00:58.970 align:middle line:84% Now, we can see that the power MOSFETs 00:00:58.970 --> 00:01:02.450 align:middle line:90% M1 and M2 are inside the IC. 00:01:02.450 --> 00:01:05.410 align:middle line:84% So therefore, they're in very close proximity. 00:01:05.410 --> 00:01:08.680 align:middle line:84% The input capacitor is also very, very close 00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:10.790 align:middle line:84% to the IC, because it's physically 00:01:10.790 --> 00:01:13.310 align:middle line:90% smaller than the IC itself. 00:01:13.310 --> 00:01:16.010 align:middle line:84% Now, the critical loop that we have 00:01:16.010 --> 00:01:18.710 align:middle line:84% to deal with when dealing with EMI 00:01:18.710 --> 00:01:22.570 align:middle line:84% is between the input capacitors and the two MOSFET transistors 00:01:22.570 --> 00:01:24.450 align:middle line:90% that you see here. 00:01:24.450 --> 00:01:28.180 align:middle line:84% The reason that this current loop is critical 00:01:28.180 --> 00:01:32.270 align:middle line:84% is that the currents in the loop are changing very fast. 00:01:32.270 --> 00:01:35.490 align:middle line:84% They're turning on and off at a very rapid rate. 00:01:35.490 --> 00:01:38.370 align:middle line:84% And that's basically what causes both 00:01:38.370 --> 00:01:41.380 align:middle line:90% conducted and radiated EMI. 00:01:41.380 --> 00:01:45.290 align:middle line:84% So the whole key to minimizing your EMI 00:01:45.290 --> 00:01:48.395 align:middle line:84% is to keep that critical loop area very, very small, 00:01:48.395 --> 00:01:51.100 align:middle line:84% or at least as small as possible. 00:01:51.100 --> 00:01:54.550 align:middle line:84% Basically, what happens is that small loop between the input 00:01:54.550 --> 00:01:58.840 align:middle line:84% capacitors and the power MOSFETs creates a small antenna 00:01:58.840 --> 00:02:01.330 align:middle line:90% that radiates EMI. 00:02:01.330 --> 00:02:03.530 align:middle line:84% Now, if we look over here on the right-hand side, 00:02:03.530 --> 00:02:06.610 align:middle line:84% we see a typical nonsynchronous converter. 00:02:06.610 --> 00:02:08.990 align:middle line:84% In this case, we have a Schottky diode 00:02:08.990 --> 00:02:11.730 align:middle line:84% that takes the place of transistor M2. 00:02:11.730 --> 00:02:14.080 align:middle line:84% And that's the key difference between these two power 00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:15.160 align:middle line:90% supplies. 00:02:15.160 --> 00:02:19.920 align:middle line:84% Because the Schottky diode is external and physically larger 00:02:19.920 --> 00:02:24.400 align:middle line:84% than typically the input capacitor or the IC sometimes, 00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:26.150 align:middle line:84% that necessitates the current loop 00:02:26.150 --> 00:02:29.040 align:middle line:84% to be actually a little bit larger than it 00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:32.690 align:middle line:84% is in a synchronous converter for the same current rating 00:02:32.690 --> 00:02:35.070 align:middle line:84% and the same voltage and power ratings. 00:02:35.070 --> 00:02:38.210 align:middle line:84% So you can see here, basically with the nonsynchronous 00:02:38.210 --> 00:02:40.800 align:middle line:84% converter, you're almost forced to have 00:02:40.800 --> 00:02:43.760 align:middle line:84% a slightly larger critical loop area than you 00:02:43.760 --> 00:02:47.770 align:middle line:90% do for a synchronous converter. 00:02:47.770 --> 00:02:49.990 align:middle line:84% Now, here's a typical example of a layout 00:02:49.990 --> 00:02:51.740 align:middle line:90% for a synchronous converter. 00:02:51.740 --> 00:02:55.130 align:middle line:84% On the right-hand side, you see the IC itself 00:02:55.130 --> 00:02:57.540 align:middle line:84% with the two power MOSFETs inside, 00:02:57.540 --> 00:03:00.080 align:middle line:84% and you see the input capacitor right next to it, 00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:01.840 align:middle line:90% physically very close. 00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:05.270 align:middle line:84% So you can see by moving the input capacitor as close as 00:03:05.270 --> 00:03:08.300 align:middle line:84% possible to the IC that current loop 00:03:08.300 --> 00:03:10.820 align:middle line:90% area is going to be very small. 00:03:10.820 --> 00:03:12.720 align:middle line:84% In this case, the dotted red line 00:03:12.720 --> 00:03:17.340 align:middle line:84% signifies the critical loop area that we're trying to minimize. 00:03:17.340 --> 00:03:20.140 align:middle line:84% In the nonsynchronous converter, it's 00:03:20.140 --> 00:03:23.150 align:middle line:84% easy to see that we have the Schottky diode designated 00:03:23.150 --> 00:03:27.170 align:middle line:84% as D1, which is actually a little bit 00:03:27.170 --> 00:03:29.880 align:middle line:84% larger than the IC itself and quite a bit larger 00:03:29.880 --> 00:03:31.590 align:middle line:90% than the input capacitor. 00:03:31.590 --> 00:03:33.520 align:middle line:84% So it makes it a little bit difficult 00:03:33.520 --> 00:03:37.020 align:middle line:84% to get all the components as close as possible-- a little 00:03:37.020 --> 00:03:40.760 align:middle line:84% bit more difficult than it is in a synchronous converter, 00:03:40.760 --> 00:03:43.780 align:middle line:84% but it's not impossible to get a good, tight loop. 00:03:43.780 --> 00:03:46.370 align:middle line:84% But you can see here from the dotted box that 00:03:46.370 --> 00:03:49.160 align:middle line:84% represents the critical loop area that it's always 00:03:49.160 --> 00:03:53.750 align:middle line:84% going to be a little bit more than for a synchronous 00:03:53.750 --> 00:03:57.000 align:middle line:90% converter would be. 00:03:57.000 --> 00:04:00.810 align:middle line:84% So the question is how do we get good EMI performance 00:04:00.810 --> 00:04:04.160 align:middle line:84% from a nonsynchronous buck converter. 00:04:04.160 --> 00:04:07.530 align:middle line:84% Well, there are three basic principles 00:04:07.530 --> 00:04:09.170 align:middle line:90% you have to keep in mind. 00:04:09.170 --> 00:04:12.390 align:middle line:84% One, as we just mentioned, is to keep the critical loop 00:04:12.390 --> 00:04:16.070 align:middle line:84% area as physically small as possible. 00:04:16.070 --> 00:04:21.670 align:middle line:84% Second, use both a top side and a bottom side ground plane 00:04:21.670 --> 00:04:23.590 align:middle line:90% on your PC board. 00:04:23.590 --> 00:04:27.780 align:middle line:84% Those ground planes will help to manage the loop currents 00:04:27.780 --> 00:04:31.930 align:middle line:84% and keep them where you want them to flow. 00:04:31.930 --> 00:04:37.400 align:middle line:84% And finally, make sure that you use both common mode 00:04:37.400 --> 00:04:41.850 align:middle line:84% and differential mode filters on the input to your power supply. 00:04:41.850 --> 00:04:45.490 align:middle line:84% Those filters will help to filter out the fast rising 00:04:45.490 --> 00:04:49.300 align:middle line:84% edges of the currents in those critical current loops 00:04:49.300 --> 00:04:50.870 align:middle line:90% we just talked about. 00:04:50.870 --> 00:04:54.850 align:middle line:84% And in fact, the filters will help with both radiated 00:04:54.850 --> 00:04:58.260 align:middle line:90% and conducted EMI. 00:04:58.260 --> 00:05:01.900 align:middle line:84% So we have an example to show you here today. 00:05:01.900 --> 00:05:06.710 align:middle line:84% We have an evaluation board that was designed by TI engineers 00:05:06.710 --> 00:05:12.640 align:middle line:84% specifically to minimize both conducted and radiated EMI. 00:05:12.640 --> 00:05:17.520 align:middle line:84% And essentially, the board has a very tight loop area, 00:05:17.520 --> 00:05:18.710 align:middle line:90% as we mentioned. 00:05:18.710 --> 00:05:22.460 align:middle line:84% It has both top side and bottom side ground planes, 00:05:22.460 --> 00:05:29.150 align:middle line:84% and it has both differential and common mode input filters. 00:05:29.150 --> 00:05:34.810 align:middle line:84% This particular board is based on the LMR 16030 00:05:34.810 --> 00:05:39.050 align:middle line:84% simple switcher nonsynchronous book converter. 00:05:39.050 --> 00:05:41.100 align:middle line:84% So this is what we'll use as our example 00:05:41.100 --> 00:05:44.920 align:middle line:84% today in our lab to see what kind of EMR performance 00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:46.240 align:middle line:90% we can get. 00:05:46.240 --> 00:05:51.160 align:middle line:84% So the next step is we'll take this board into the EMI chamber 00:05:51.160 --> 00:05:55.000 align:middle line:84% and go ahead and run an EMI scan. 00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.450 align:middle line:84% So here we are inside of our EMI chamber. 00:05:58.450 --> 00:06:00.930 align:middle line:84% And we have the PC board we saw earlier 00:06:00.930 --> 00:06:05.100 align:middle line:84% set up and ready to go to run an EMI scan. 00:06:05.100 --> 00:06:08.820 align:middle line:84% The input power supply to our PC board 00:06:08.820 --> 00:06:11.410 align:middle line:84% is a pair of 12-volt batteries and series 00:06:11.410 --> 00:06:14.620 align:middle line:84% that gives us 24 volts for our input supply. 00:06:14.620 --> 00:06:17.050 align:middle line:84% And it's very important to use batteries 00:06:17.050 --> 00:06:19.790 align:middle line:84% whenever you're doing any kind of EMI testing, 00:06:19.790 --> 00:06:25.160 align:middle line:84% because they provide a very low noise source for our regulator. 00:06:25.160 --> 00:06:27.400 align:middle line:84% The output of this particular regulator 00:06:27.400 --> 00:06:32.600 align:middle line:84% is designed to provide 5 volts with a load current of 3 amps. 00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:37.020 align:middle line:84% And again, we also need some very low noise load. 00:06:37.020 --> 00:06:39.560 align:middle line:84% So what we choose to use for our load 00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:42.480 align:middle line:84% is essentially a set of power resistors 00:06:42.480 --> 00:06:44.220 align:middle line:90% that are noninductive. 00:06:44.220 --> 00:06:46.620 align:middle line:84% And if you look underneath the turntable here, 00:06:46.620 --> 00:06:49.420 align:middle line:84% you will see that our load resistors are sitting 00:06:49.420 --> 00:06:51.550 align:middle line:84% on that heat sink, out of the way 00:06:51.550 --> 00:06:55.280 align:middle line:84% so they don't interfere with anything else. 00:06:55.280 --> 00:07:00.010 align:middle line:84% On the opposite side of the corner to the PC board, 00:07:00.010 --> 00:07:02.910 align:middle line:84% we have our EMI receiving antenna. 00:07:02.910 --> 00:07:04.380 align:middle line:84% And essentially, what will happen 00:07:04.380 --> 00:07:08.900 align:middle line:84% is that the EMI coming off of our PC board 00:07:08.900 --> 00:07:11.370 align:middle line:84% will be picked up by the antenna, sent 00:07:11.370 --> 00:07:15.170 align:middle line:84% through the coaxial cable, and into the receiver that's 00:07:15.170 --> 00:07:16.710 align:middle line:90% in the lab. 00:07:16.710 --> 00:07:20.850 align:middle line:84% So now we're all set to go back in the lab and run a scan. 00:07:20.850 --> 00:07:24.220 align:middle line:84% Well, we have our PC board inside the EMI chamber. 00:07:24.220 --> 00:07:27.800 align:middle line:84% And it's all powered up, and we're ready to run an EMI scan. 00:07:27.800 --> 00:07:29.518 align:middle line:84% So let's go ahead and run the receiver. 00:07:29.518 --> 00:07:42.540 align:middle line:90% 00:07:42.540 --> 00:07:44.650 align:middle line:90% So now the scan is completed. 00:07:44.650 --> 00:07:48.930 align:middle line:84% We just ran a radiated EMI scan over the frequency range 00:07:48.930 --> 00:07:51.530 align:middle line:90% of 30 megahertz to 1 gigahertz. 00:07:51.530 --> 00:07:57.420 align:middle line:84% And it's easy to see that our PC board has passed the CISPR 22 00:07:57.420 --> 00:08:00.440 align:middle line:90% class B limits. 00:08:00.440 --> 00:08:02.820 align:middle line:84% One thing to keep in mind is that the chamber 00:08:02.820 --> 00:08:07.470 align:middle line:84% we have here at TI is what's known as a three meter chamber. 00:08:07.470 --> 00:08:11.150 align:middle line:84% That means that the antenna is approximately three meters away 00:08:11.150 --> 00:08:15.700 align:middle line:84% from the PC board regulator that we're trying to test. 00:08:15.700 --> 00:08:20.110 align:middle line:84% Typically, however, in industry, the antenna 00:08:20.110 --> 00:08:24.790 align:middle line:84% will be approximately 10 meters away from the board under test. 00:08:24.790 --> 00:08:29.170 align:middle line:84% That means that typically the EMI results 00:08:29.170 --> 00:08:32.559 align:middle line:84% that you get at the antenna will be a little bit less 00:08:32.559 --> 00:08:36.940 align:middle line:84% than what we see here in our three meter chamber. 00:08:36.940 --> 00:08:40.530 align:middle line:84% So even though this EMI scan seems 00:08:40.530 --> 00:08:43.850 align:middle line:84% like it's coming very close to the CISPR limit, in reality, 00:08:43.850 --> 00:08:45.770 align:middle line:84% it will actually be a little bit further away. 00:08:45.770 --> 00:08:51.300 align:middle line:90% 00:08:51.300 --> 00:08:54.710 align:middle line:84% This slide shows us a comparison between a typical synchronous 00:08:54.710 --> 00:08:58.040 align:middle line:84% converter and the nonsynchronous converter 00:08:58.040 --> 00:09:01.030 align:middle line:84% that we just scanned, essentially. 00:09:01.030 --> 00:09:06.320 align:middle line:84% These scans were taken with an industrial 10-meter chamber. 00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:09.370 align:middle line:84% The red graph is the nonsynchronous, 00:09:09.370 --> 00:09:11.750 align:middle line:84% and the black graph is the synchronous. 00:09:11.750 --> 00:09:14.860 align:middle line:84% It's easy to see that both converters easily 00:09:14.860 --> 00:09:18.600 align:middle line:84% passed the CISPR 22 class B requirement. 00:09:18.600 --> 00:09:22.100 align:middle line:84% It's also easy to see that the nonsynchronous converter 00:09:22.100 --> 00:09:24.770 align:middle line:84% at some frequency ranges will have 00:09:24.770 --> 00:09:28.110 align:middle line:84% a little bit more EMI than a comparable synchronous 00:09:28.110 --> 00:09:29.040 align:middle line:90% converter. 00:09:29.040 --> 00:09:30.690 align:middle line:84% And that's what you would expect, 00:09:30.690 --> 00:09:33.220 align:middle line:84% because it's a little bit more difficult to get 00:09:33.220 --> 00:09:36.510 align:middle line:84% the critical loop area as small as it would 00:09:36.510 --> 00:09:39.290 align:middle line:90% be for a synchronous converter. 00:09:39.290 --> 00:09:42.430 align:middle line:84% So in summary, to achieve good EMI results 00:09:42.430 --> 00:09:45.290 align:middle line:84% from a nonsynchronous converter, just keep in mind 00:09:45.290 --> 00:09:47.040 align:middle line:90% these three points. 00:09:47.040 --> 00:09:51.120 align:middle line:84% Keep the critical PC board loop area as small as possible. 00:09:51.120 --> 00:09:53.850 align:middle line:84% Use generous ground planes to keep the currents flowing 00:09:53.850 --> 00:09:58.720 align:middle line:84% in small loops, and use both common mode and differential 00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:01.610 align:middle line:84% mode input filters to help filter 00:10:01.610 --> 00:10:05.370 align:middle line:84% out some of the EMI noise generated by the switch. 00:10:05.370 --> 00:10:07.060 align:middle line:90% So there you have it. 00:10:07.060 --> 00:10:10.040 align:middle line:84% We've showed you today how you can minimize 00:10:10.040 --> 00:10:13.490 align:middle line:84% the amount of both radiated and conducted 00:10:13.490 --> 00:10:17.340 align:middle line:84% EMI in a nonsynchronous design by following 00:10:17.340 --> 00:10:19.500 align:middle line:90% a few simple rules. 00:10:19.500 --> 00:10:22.290 align:middle line:84% So for more information, please see the links 00:10:22.290 --> 00:10:24.060 align:middle line:90% at the end of this video. 00:10:24.060 --> 00:10:26.190 align:middle line:90% And thank you for watching. 00:10:26.190 --> 00:10:43.136 align:middle line:90%